Last week’s sensational bird video showed a red-tailed hawk attacking a personal drone in Cambridge, Massachusetts (above). The drone lost.
Drones are popular because they’re easy to fly and come with onboard videocams. Open the box, assemble a few pieces, turn on the camera, and fly it up and into … trouble, if you aren’t careful. Novices don’t realize who owns the sky.
When Amazon Prime announced plans last December to deliver packages using drones it sounded simple but the initial hype failed to mention the regulatory, mechanical and natural hurdles. Blog posts at Slate and The Atlantic immediately set the record straight.
At Slate Konstantin Kakaes explained how unreliable drones are right now and how much the FAA controls the airspace. Drone pilots looking for killer video ignore the law to their peril and have been arrested.
The next day Nicholas Lund at Slate and Megan Garber at The Atlantic were quick to mention the bird factor. Click on The Atlantic link to see five videos of angry bird attacks.
The FAA limits personal drones to a 400-foot ceiling — that’s below the 30th floor of the Cathedral of Learning — but birds of prey limit flying threats to a much lower level than that. Red-tailed hawks near the Cathedral of Learning are frequently reminded that peregrines own the airspace above the treetops. Drone pilots could learn a valuable lesson from a bald eagle who strayed into Dorothy’s zone.
Birds have owned the sky for 160 million years.
(drone video by Christopher Schmidt on YouTube. Click on Christopher’s link to read more about the hawk video)